<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[ID3-Tags einer ganzen CD]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Hallo!</p>
<p dir="auto">Ich habe Audiograbber 1.70 und den LAME 3.89.<br />
Eigentlich funktioniert alles wie geschmiert, noch dazu schnell; auch die Funktion der CDDB ist genial...<br />
Doch eines stört mich: Wenn ich eine ganze CD rippen und in MP3 umwandeln will, werden zwar die Titel/Interpreten angezeigt, aber nicht die ID3-Tags. Die muss ich nämlich immer für jeden Song einzeln eingeben. (Nur der Songtitel)</p>
<p dir="auto">Gibt es eine Möglichkeit, daß die ID3s von vornherein richtig für jeden Song erscheinen? Dann könnte ich nämlich eine ganze CD viel schneller rippen...</p>
<p dir="auto">Wäre für Hilfe sehr dankbar.</p>
<p dir="auto">Dante</p>
<p dir="auto">P.S.: Für die "smart asses" - das Getting Started habe ich gelesen und auch die FAQ sowie das Forum durchstöbert, aber entweder habe ich es überlesen oder nicht gefunden, was ich wollte...</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.audiograbber.de/topic/114/id3-tags-einer-ganzen-cd</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2026 11:01:06 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://forum.audiograbber.de/topic/114.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2001 13:30:30 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to ID3-Tags einer ganzen CD on Fri, 07 Dec 2001 17:35:18 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">und vielleicht noch lame 3.90 mit dibroms presets:</p>
<p dir="auto"><a href="http://mitiok.free.fr/lame_dm_rev7-bin_f.zip" rel="nofollow ugc">http://mitiok.free.fr/lame_dm_rev7-bin_f.zip</a></p>
<h2>--<br />
from<br />
<a href="http://www.hydrogenaudio.org/forums/showthread.php?goto=newpost&amp;amp;threadid=411" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.hydrogenaudio.org/forums/showthread.php?goto=newpost&amp;amp;threadid=411</a></h2>
<p dir="auto">Project Mayhem - rev7 stuff<br />
Dibrom  Administrator Hydrogen Audio Coordinator</p>
<p dir="auto">OK... here we go.<br />
Just to summarize everything for people who may not have kept<br />
up on some of the massive threads in the past, here is what<br />
the current situation is:</p>
<ol>
<li>--alt-preset normal is no more. I removed that. It's back<br />
to standard/extreme/insane now.</li>
<li>--alt-preset standard has been modified to include many of<br />
the changes or tweaks I learned from my experience with<br />
--alt-preset normal.</li>
</ol>
<p dir="auto">List of What's New in --alt-preset standard and which clips it<br />
helps or what it does:</p>
<ul>
<li>
<p dir="auto">tweaked block switching thresholds (helps fatboy and<br />
florida_seq)</p>
</li>
<li>
<p dir="auto">--nsmsfix 2.13 is used now in addition to internal<br />
modifications to masking thresholds of mid-side channels.<br />
These two in combination allow for less ss frames (reduced<br />
bitrate) in situations which do not seem to need them as much<br />
and more where they are necessary (serioustrouble for example)</p>
</li>
<li>
<p dir="auto">added method to switch noise measuring functions on<br />
non-normal blocks (start, short, stop) (helps fatboy and other<br />
impulse samples)</p>
</li>
<li>
<p dir="auto">added method to switch noise shaping functions depending on<br />
athadjust (helps fatboy and other impulse samples)</p>
</li>
<li>
<p dir="auto">added --athlower -1 (decreases bitrate)</p>
</li>
<li>
<p dir="auto">changed --ns-sfb21 3 to --ns-sfb21 3.75 (decreases bitrate)</p>
</li>
<li>
<p dir="auto">changed lowpass to 19khz (decreases bitrate)</p>
</li>
<li>
<p dir="auto">What all this means? That --alt-preset is now lower in<br />
bitrate (competitive with --r3mix) and higher in quality than<br />
before.</p>
</li>
</ul>
<p dir="auto">Many of these changes are activated only with --dm-preset<br />
standard (appropriate tweaks will eventually propagate to all<br />
--alt-presets) as a switch, there are no external switches to<br />
turn them on and there will not be any added. The reason for<br />
this is because doing such a thing would add quite a few new<br />
experimental switches which really should be handled<br />
internally in the first place, not to mention most of these<br />
modifications are tuned right to the threshold, there's not<br />
much room for tweaking without further code level<br />
modifications.</p>
<p dir="auto">Clips which are significantly improved over the old<br />
dm-standard include fatboy, ravebase, gbtinc, serioustrouble,<br />
and to some extent short.</p>
<p dir="auto">Many clips now encode to a much lower bitrate with essentially<br />
identical quality.</p>
<p dir="auto">Clips which --alt-preset standard significantly outperforms<br />
--r3mix on include:</p>
<p dir="auto">amnesia<br />
2nd_vent_clip<br />
serioustrouble<br />
death2<br />
castanets<br />
short<br />
ravebase<br />
gbtinc<br />
florida_seq<br />
fatboy<br />
gekkou-intro<br />
velvet<br />
etc..</p>
<p dir="auto">There a lot more, those are just the ones that come to me off<br />
the top of my head. As it stands right now I don't believe I<br />
know of any clip where --r3mix is even marginally better<br />
sounding anymore. Before --r3mix did a little better on fatboy<br />
due to some flaws in masking/noise shaping which I have now<br />
compensated for in the new mode.</p>
<p dir="auto">As with --alt-preset normal, the theme stays basically the<br />
same:</p>
<ul>
<li>
<p dir="auto">On heavily distorted clips like metal, this preset will<br />
often provide a lower bitrate (bitrate may be reduced even<br />
more, theres some stuff with the joint stereo that could<br />
possibly still be tweaked better).</p>
</li>
<li>
<p dir="auto">On quieter clips this preset should not dip as low, and on<br />
quiet clips with lots of transients (such as death2) this<br />
preset will scale upwards accordingly instead of sticking with<br />
too low of a bitrate.</p>
</li>
</ul>
<p dir="auto">This preset basically also shouldn't bloat on quieter samples<br />
to the degree that --alt-preset normal did. It also doesn't<br />
have ath problems -- try encoding the love.wav sample for<br />
example... solid frequency encoding all the way up to 16khz,<br />
which is higher than --r3mix's (13khz with some speckling<br />
upwards) and standard still manages to encode to a lower<br />
bitrate!</p>
<p dir="auto">I'm including the source also, but keep in mind that parts of<br />
it are kind of hackish, certain command line settings are<br />
overridden internally (sometimes with hardcoded values) at the<br />
moment because I haven't had time to implement everything<br />
"properly" yet. This will not be the final source. Also, many<br />
of these changes seem a tad underwhelming considering how long<br />
in the making they have been but keep in mind that it's the<br />
tuning that's the hard part.. actually finding out where to<br />
make the changes and what actually works.</p>
<p dir="auto">That's about all I can think of for now...</p>
<p dir="auto">Oh one last thing.. I'm aware of certain people going back to<br />
using sine sweeps to test presets now and I just want to say<br />
that that's about the most foolish way to test for quality. In<br />
addition, designing presets around sine sweeps is even more<br />
pointless. Part of the problem with many of the sine sweeps<br />
people are using is that they induce clipping and contain<br />
frequencies of such high amplitude all the way to 22khz that<br />
they artificially induce artifacts. Udial.wav is a perfect<br />
example of this. These samples are totally pointless because<br />
you are never going to hear them in real music (the risk of<br />
blowing speakers out is too high for one, not to mention they<br />
hurt your ears). So if you see someone passing judgement on<br />
something based on a single sine sweep test alone, make sure<br />
to take that with a grain of salt.</p>
<p dir="auto">All the presets I work on are tuned with a multitude of<br />
extremely difficult samples from real music. They come from<br />
all different styles from acoustic, to heavily distorted, to<br />
bizarre electronic, to classical and nearly everything in<br />
between.</p>
<p dir="auto">The argument that sine sweeps may be representative of some<br />
fringe electronic music is flawed IMO because I happen to<br />
listen to quite a lot of the more unusual electronic music<br />
(autechre, two lone swordsmen, pan sonic, brume, v/vm, etc<br />
just to name a few) and I've never heard a sample like<br />
udial.wav or some of these clipping inducing sine sweeps in<br />
any of them. Just a bit of perspective there...</p>
<p dir="auto">Anyway, enjoy the new preset (it might have some bugs but I<br />
think it's fairly solid). Feedback is appreciated as always.<br />
I'll try to come read and respond to posts here as much as I<br />
can but no guarantees on being able to answer rapidly or<br />
anything like that.<br />
12-01-2001 at 10:33 AM</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.audiograbber.de/post/646</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.audiograbber.de/post/646</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[benjamin_lebsanft]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2001 17:35:18 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to ID3-Tags einer ganzen CD on Fri, 07 Dec 2001 17:34:09 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Und benütz das MAD Plugin :</p>
<p dir="auto"><a href="http://www.mars.org/home/rob/proj/mpeg/mad-plugin/MAD%20plug-in%200.14.2b.exe" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.mars.org/home/rob/proj/mpeg/mad-plugin/MAD plug-in 0.14.2b.exe</a></p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.audiograbber.de/post/645</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.audiograbber.de/post/645</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[benjamin_lebsanft]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2001 17:34:09 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to ID3-Tags einer ganzen CD on Fri, 07 Dec 2001 16:34:04 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Ich weiß nicht, was dein Problem ist. Die ID3-Tags werden automatisch MIT Songname erstellt, da muss man normalerweise gar nichts extra eingeben. Sie werden auch  nicht "angezeigt", sondern einfach in die MP3-Datei geschrieben.<br />
Kopier einfach mal ein paar Tracks und schaue dann z.B. mit Winamp die ID3-Tags an. Das sollte einwandfrei funktionieren...</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.audiograbber.de/post/644</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.audiograbber.de/post/644</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[stefan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2001 16:34:04 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>